THE ROLE OF INTERACTIVE ACTIVITIES FOR TEACHING FOREIGN LANGUAGE IN PRIMARY SCHOOL
Main Article Content
Abstract
Interactive activities play a vital role in enhancing language learning among primary school students. These activities—such as games, role-play, storytelling, songs, and group discussions—encourage active participation, improve communication skills, and foster a positive learning environment. By engaging students in meaningful and enjoyable tasks, interactive methods help develop vocabulary, grammar, listening, and speaking skills more effectively than traditional approaches. Furthermore, they cater to various learning styles and promote collaboration and creativity. This paper explores the impact of interactive activities on language acquisition in young learners and highlights best practices for incorporating them into the classroom.
Article Details
References
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, 80(2), 139–148
Council of Europe. (2001). Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, teaching, assessment (CEFR). Cambridge University Press.
González‑Lloret, M. (2015). A practical guide to integrating technology into task‑based language teaching. Georgetown University Press.
Lee, J. H., & Macaro, E. (2013). Investigating age in the use of L1 or English‑only instruction: Vocabulary acquisition by Korean EFL learners. Modern Language Journal, 97(4), 887–901.
Pinter, A. (2006). Teaching young language learners. Oxford University Press.
Tomlinson, B. (Ed.). (2013). Materials development in language teaching (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Wright, A., Betteridge, D., & Buckby, M. (2006). Games for language learning (3rd ed.). Cambridge University Press.
Yu, B., & Lee, O. (2017). Game‑based assessment for young learners: Measuring vocabulary through interactive play. Language Teaching Research, 21(5), 555–574